rec.arts.movies.production.sound

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:06:56 -0500, jwsound wrote
(in article
):

> On Nov 27, 11:43 pm, Ray Beentjes
> wrote:
>> 48048 sample rate is commonplace now and entirely valid. However the
>> timecode would be 30FPS and not .
>> Ray Beentjes
>
> The final decision, now, is for me to be at / which makes
> sense. When pulled down it should result in / which is
> what they want. Fotokem got as confused as the assistant editor by
> looking at the end result and thinking I should set my machine up in
> that manner. I don't see any problem with / although I
> know they could still get the desired result for an HD daily workflow
> on a film shoot with me at and 30 ndf as always.
>
> Thanks for all the help from everyone on this issue.
>
> Regards, Jeff Wexler
>

Jeff,

Thanks for the opportunity to kick the can.

Here's my question to your last statement. If 48/ is the destination,
how does using 48/30 ND get you there after pull down? Wouldn't you be at
47.?? and ?

Regards,

Ty Ford

--Audio Equipment Reviews Audio Production Services
Acting and Voiceover Demos
Guitar player?: /watch?v=4RZJ9MptZmU