soc.women

On Sep 24, 2:30 pm, ZerkonX wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:25:23 -0700, collection60 wrote:
> > That... my friend, is the answer.
>
> 1) What makes you think you are our friend?

Well, I am to write for decent people. Or at least people capable of
becoming decent.

If you think you are a total asshole, then perhaps my message isn't
for you.

> 2) We have traveled light years to get here and you think you are in a
> position to lecture us about the universe?

Yes.

> 3) Since you are obviously a self-hating human with self-aggrandizing
> pretensions, your value to us as a source of information is inversely
> proportionate to your seeming need to give it.

OK. So... you don't reason, and you give personal attacks instead of
reasoning. You didn't even address a single thing I said. For all I
know, you didn't even read it. If that is true, then surely your
personal attack applies just as much to you or anyone else?

So it's just as logical if I were to say "no you are".

Anyhow, you are displaying typical human behaviour.

> Do not call us. We will not call you.

Good. I don't want humans reading my message.