soc.women

"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
news: @ ...
> Ken Chaddock wrote:
>>
>> R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>
>> > You missed it. Given a presumptively equal number of men and women
>> > who want sex, EVERY person will be paired off, meaning that NOBODY
>> > will be able to select anyone that much more attractive than they are.
>>
>> Well that is total nonsense, we're not talking about what someone
>> will
>> *have to take* because they have no choice, but what they would rather
>> have given a choice...and Steve, "hot" women and "well off or wealthy
>> men will ALWAYS have a choice...

Wealthy men always have a choice and a female being hot is just the basic
qualification. On top of that she'll need other qualities to get the wealthy
man and I'm only talking about a quick fuck lol
Money = choice. In females and in everything else.


> -----------------
> Sure, but the point is, here, that this ISN'T evolutionary, because
> to do that they would have to make their kind predominate, and the
> wealthy are always trying to LIMIT their offspring, so they don't
> have to divide their fortune down!!

That's not always true.



> Steve