soc.women

"Michelle la Belle" wrote in message
news: @ ...
> On Sep 16, 1:50 am, Old_Timer wrote:
>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:45:37 -0700, Michelle la Belle
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>> >On Sep 15, 11:33 pm, "Ranting" wrote:
>> >> "Michelle la Belle" wrote in
>> >> messagenews: @ ...
>>
>> >> > OH for sure, for marriage and having babies, but for having sex it
>> >> > may
>> >> > be or may not be different. Jagger is ugly but he's sexy. You know
>> >> > he's not cute anymore, but there's still something sexy about him.
>> >> > Powerful men will be able to take hot women. The other way
>> >> > round ....... probably not. Margaret Thatcher, anyone? (Sorry -
>> >> > first powerful woman that came to mind).
>>
>> >> Yup, that is what I mean, Men don't really care much how 'powerfull'
>> >> or rich
>> >> a woman is, as long as she is attractive, I am sure there are
>> >> exception, but
>> >> they aren't the rule
>>
>> >I have never sought out a man who was rich or powerful.

That's only because you're too fugly to get one lol


Never been
>> >interested. Quite the opposite; sadly I have taken poor, feeble men
>> >under my wing and provided for the drug-toking, couch-loving dears.

That's more the fat fugly girl class.



>> >Now that I have matured at the age of 39, I am considering finding a
>> >man who at least has a job. lol

Like any real man would want a fat fugly 40 yo hahahaha



>>
>> You have a lot in common with my daughter. She is also stupid.
>>
>> Old_Timer- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> If by stupid you're referring to my taking jobless men under my wind,
> I agree with you, that was stupid. That's no longer so. Please
> clarify.
>