soc.women

"Vandar" wrote in message
news: $ @ ...
> R. Steve Walz wrote:
>
>> Vandar wrote:
>>
>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>beavis wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>If abortion does not kill a baby then why is killing a pregnant
>>>>>>>>>woman
>>>>>>>>>double murder??
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>----------------
>>>>>>>>It isn't. It's regarded as a crime against the mother. Only
>>>>>>>>uneducated
>>>>>>>>slobbering hooting nincompoops call it "double-murder", the law does
>>>>>>>>NOT.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /trials/peterson/
>>>>>>>I guess those at CourtTV are "slobbering hooting nincompoops".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>California Penal Code Section 187
>>>>>>>(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a
>>>>>>>fetus, with malice aforethought.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-----------------
>>>>>>More legalistic nonsense. The SCotUS says it isn't, and as I recall,
>>>>>>that is the Law of the Land.
>>>>>
>>>>>The SCOTUS does not define murder and is not the law of the land.
>>>>
>>>>----------------
>>>>I can't really help that you're obviously uneducated and illiterate.
>>>
>>>The Constitution is the law of the land, Einstein. The SCOTUS doesn't
>>>make law.
>>
>> -------------
>> The SCotUS INTERPRETS the Constitution, and is the SOLE interpreter!
>
> All you need to do now is point out where murder is defined in the
> Constitution.
> Since it isn't, the SCOTUS does NOT say murder doesn't include a fetus.
> States define such things and California has defined the unlawful killing
> of a fetus, with malice aforethought, to be murder.
> The SCOTUS doesn't factor into that in any way.

LOL!
How about that 4th Amendment that GUARANTEES SAFETY AND SECURITY IN ONE'S
PERSON?
LOL!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Another pro-choice idiot needed to ask.