soc.women

R. Steve Walz wrote:

> Vandar wrote:
>
>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>beavis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>If abortion does not kill a baby then why is killing a pregnant woman
>>>>>>>>>>>>double murder??
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>----------------
>>>>>>>>>>>It isn't. It's regarded as a crime against the mother. Only uneducated
>>>>>>>>>>>slobbering hooting nincompoops call it "double-murder", the law does
>>>>>>>>>>>NOT.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> /trials/peterson/
>>>>>>>>>>I guess those at CourtTV are "slobbering hooting nincompoops".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>California Penal Code Section 187
>>>>>>>>>>(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a
>>>>>>>>>>fetus, with malice aforethought.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>-----------------
>>>>>>>>>More legalistic nonsense. The SCotUS says it isn't, and as I recall,
>>>>>>>>>that is the Law of the Land.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The SCOTUS does not define murder and is not the law of the land.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>----------------
>>>>>>>I can't really help that you're obviously uneducated and illiterate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The Constitution is the law of the land, Einstein. The SCOTUS doesn't
>>>>>>make law.
>>>>>
>>>>>-------------
>>>>>The SCotUS INTERPRETS the Constitution, and is the SOLE interpreter!
>>>>
>>>>All you need to do now is point out where murder is defined in the
>>>>Constitution.
>>>>Since it isn't, the SCOTUS does NOT say murder doesn't include a fetus.
>>>
>>>------------------------
>>>You need to read the decisions. The meaning of "person" is decided
>>>by the SCotUS in numerous cases the last 50 years.
>>
>>California Penal Code Section 187
>>(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a
>>fetus, with malice aforethought.
>>
>>I'm not saying I agree with it, but that's a valid law. It's what made
>>Scott Peterson a double murderer.
>>
>>
>>>>States define such things and California has defined the unlawful
>>>>killing of a fetus, with malice aforethought, to be murder.
>>>>The SCOTUS doesn't factor into that in any way.
>>>
>>>-------------------------
>>>No, your grasp of law is uneducated and faulty.
>>
>>Great rebuttal. I'm convinced. I'm sure the California Legislature will
>>be changing their definition of murder post-haste.
>
> -------------
> They know better, they knew the SCotUS would have to overturn it.

They haven't and they won't. The definition of murder is a state issue.

> They did it just so they could get people like Scott Peterson.

Riiiiiight.