John D. Wentzky
>"Mark Sebree"
>news: @ ...
>> On Oct 2, 7:42 pm, "John D. Wentzky"
>>> "Vandar"
>>>
>>> news: $ @ ...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>
>>> >> Vandar wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>beavis wrote:
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>If abortion does not kill a baby then why is killing a pregnant
>>> >>>>>>>>>woman
>>> >>>>>>>>>double murder??
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>----------------
>>> >>>>>>>>It isn't. It's regarded as a crime against the mother. Only
>>> >>>>>>>>uneducated
>>> >>>>>>>>slobbering hooting nincompoops call it "double-murder", the law
>>> >>>>>>>>does
>>> >>>>>>>>NOT.
>>>
>>> >>>>>>> /trials/peterson/
>>> >>>>>>>I guess those at CourtTV are "slobbering hooting nincompoops".
>>>
>>> >>>>>>>California Penal Code Section 187
>>> >>>>>>>(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a
>>> >>>>>>>fetus, with malice aforethought.
>>>
>>> >>>>>>-----------------
>>> >>>>>>More legalistic nonsense. The SCotUS says it isn't, and as I
>>> >>>>>>recall,
>>> >>>>>>that is the Law of the Land.
>>>
>>> >>>>>The SCOTUS does not define murder and is not the law of the land.
>>>
>>> >>>>----------------
>>> >>>>I can't really help that you're obviously uneducated and illiterate.
>>>
>>> >>>The Constitution is the law of the land, Einstein. The SCOTUS doesn't
>>> >>>make law.
>>>
>>> >> -------------
>>> >> The SCotUS INTERPRETS the Constitution, and is the SOLE interpreter!
>>>
>>> > All you need to do now is point out where murder is defined in the
>>> > Constitution.
>>> > Since it isn't, the SCOTUS does NOT say murder doesn't include a fetus.
>>> > States define such things and California has defined the unlawful
>>> > killing
>>> > of a fetus, with malice aforethought, to be murder.
>>> > The SCOTUS doesn't factor into that in any way.
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>> How about that 4th Amendment that GUARANTEES SAFETY AND SECURITY IN ONE'S
>>> PERSON?
>>
>> You mean like the woman that does not want to be harmed by a pregnancy
>> that she is experiencing?
>
>Consent to the act that causes pregnancy is consent to pregnancy itself,
Just like you consented to another prison term when you committed a
crime.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@