soc.women

R. Steve Walz wrote:

> John D. Wentzky wrote:
>
>>"R. Steve Walz" wrote in message
>>news: @ ...
>>
>>>John D. Wentzky wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Vandar" wrote in message
>>>>news: $ @ ...
>>>>
>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Vandar wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>R. Steve Walz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>beavis wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>If abortion does not kill a baby then why is killing a pregnant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>woman
>>>>>>>>>>>>>double murder??
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>----------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>It isn't. It's regarded as a crime against the mother. Only
>>>>>>>>>>>>uneducated
>>>>>>>>>>>>slobbering hooting nincompoops call it "double-murder", the law
>>>>>>>>>>>>does
>>>>>>>>>>>>NOT.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> /trials/peterson/
>>>>>>>>>>>I guess those at CourtTV are "slobbering hooting nincompoops".
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>California Penal Code Section 187
>>>>>>>>>>>(a) Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being, or a
>>>>>>>>>>>fetus, with malice aforethought.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>-----------------
>>>>>>>>>>More legalistic nonsense. The SCotUS says it isn't, and as I
>>>>>>>>>>recall,
>>>>>>>>>>that is the Law of the Land.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>The SCOTUS does not define murder and is not the law of the land.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>----------------
>>>>>>>>I can't really help that you're obviously uneducated and illiterate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The Constitution is the law of the land, Einstein. The SCOTUS doesn't
>>>>>>>make law.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-------------
>>>>>>The SCotUS INTERPRETS the Constitution, and is the SOLE interpreter!
>>>>>
>>>>>All you need to do now is point out where murder is defined in the
>>>>>Constitution.
>>>>>Since it isn't, the SCOTUS does NOT say murder doesn't include a fetus.
>>>>>States define such things and California has defined the unlawful
>>>>>killing
>>>>>of a fetus, with malice aforethought, to be murder.
>>>>>The SCOTUS doesn't factor into that in any way.
>>>>
>>>>LOL!
>>>>How about that 4th Amendment that GUARANTEES SAFETY AND SECURITY IN ONE'S
>>>>PERSON?
>>>
>>>-----------------
>>>IF you're a human being, fetuses are not.
>>
>>Look. It isn't me who is clinging to some ignorant, negligent excuse that
>>acts as if persons who are in utero are not persons.
>
> ---------------
> Gee, I'm not either, that leaves you again, asswipe.
>
> Fetuses are NOT persons.
> If we ever were fetuses we'd remember it.
> Since we don't, WE WEREN'T!!

I was one year old once. I even have pictures to prove it, but I don't
remember it. Most adults' memories don't go much further back than 5
years old or so.