soc.women

In article < $ @edtnps82>,
Ken Chaddock wrote:

> Ray Fischer wrote:
>
> > Ken Chaddock wrote:
> >
> >>Ray Fischer wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Ken Chaddock wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Gwenyth Bennet wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Aug 3, 7:27 am, Martin wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Gwen wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>On Aug 3, 6:29 am, Quadibloc wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:26:40 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
> >>>>>>>> wrote, in part:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>As written, the bill would ban women from
> >>>>>>>>>seeking an abortion without written consent from the father of the
> >>>>>>>>>fetus. In cases where the identity of the father is unknown, women
> >>>>>>>>>would be required to submit a list of possible fathers.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>This is disgusting, because the murder of an innocent child is no less
> >>>>>>>>murder simply because the woman has her partner as an accessory.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Lying about the issue isn't going to score you points with anybody but
> >>>>>>>the slimeballs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>hang on a sec.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>You did read the paragraph below? I thought Quad put forward good
> >>>>>>arguments from both a pro and anti view as to why this proposal was a
> >>>>>>load of crap.
> >>>>
> >>>>>I addressed John Savard's lie.
> >>>>
> >>>> Which "lie" would that be ? Many pro-life supporters *BELIEVE* that a
> >>>>fetus is simply one stage in the continuum of human life and as such, is
> >>>>as inseparable from the child it will become as that child is from the
> >>>>adult it will become.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Pro-liars believe many irrational things. You even believe that a
> >>>fetus is a human being worthy of rights but a pregnant women is not a
> >>>human being with rights.
> >>
> >> The only liar in this thread appears to be you Ray.
> >
> >
> > "I know you are but what am I?"
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >> I realize that you, like many others, don't have the moral fortitude to
> >>accept that abortion (with current technology) means killing a fetus
> >>that is a developing human being
> >
> >
> > In the same way that using a condom kills a million developing human
> > beings.
>
> You see Ray, it's extremist, logically deficient and objectively (and
> obviously) incorrect statements like this that destroy your credibility.
> Condom use no more destroys a fetus than does masturbation since if
> there is no joining of sperm with ovum, there's no fetus to destroy
> where as, OTOH, a 40+ week old fetus is (legal fictions aside)
> effectively identical to a 1 second old child...


why would you falsely attribute such a statement to ray when his
actual words are shown above?

--
get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.