soc.women

On Aug 3, 7:31 am, "james g. keegan jr." wrote:
> In article < ...@ >,
>
> Quadibloc wrote:
> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:26:40 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
> > wrote, in part:
>
> > >As written, the bill would ban women from
> > >seeking anabortionwithout written consent from the father of the
> > >fetus. In cases where the identity of the father is unknown, women
> > >would be required to submit a list of possible fathers.
>
> > This is disgusting, because the murder of an innocent child
>
> you demonstrate your ignorance of the words "murder" and "child."

So did every person of any kind in the Unted States until 1973
regardless of religion race creed or any other consideration. Because
everybody considered it murder of a child. Say, come to think of it,
some portion of the legal system "continues" to see it that way as
they find that the murder of a pregnant woman is a double murder and
is so prosecuted. Now you know where that law came from...the history
of this country.

>
> --
> get real. like jesus would ever own a gun or vote republican.