soc.women

yarrido@ wrote:
>On Aug 11, 1:59 am, rfisc...@ (Ray Fischer) wrote:
>> yarr...@ wrote:
>> > "james g. keegan jr." wrote:
>> >> In article < ...@ >,
>>
>> >> Quadibloc wrote:
>> >> > On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:26:40 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
>> >> > wrote, in part:
>>
>> >> > >As written, the bill would ban women from
>> >> > >seeking anabortionwithout written consent from the father of the
>> >> > >fetus. In cases where the identity of the father is unknown, women
>> >> > >would be required to submit a list of possible fathers.
>>
>> >> > This is disgusting, because the murder of an innocent child
>>
>> >> you demonstrate your ignorance of the words "murder" and "child."
>>
>> >So did every person of any kind in the Unted States until 1973
>>
>> Abortion has never been murder, pro-liar. Not even when it was
>> illegal.
>
>Actually, that depends on what you include/exclude from defintion of
>abortion.

You're a child molester depending upon what you "include/exclude from
defintion of" child molester.

> If the pregnant woman is murdered and the unborn dies,

That's not an abortion.

> So, while
>such a death is not called an abortion, I see no difference as in both

That's because you're a pro-liar moron who would rather believe in
your perverted fantasy than accept the truth.

--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@