soc.women

On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:56:53 GMT, Ken Chaddock
wrote:

>Paul Anderson wrote:
>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 20:16:32 -0700, Quadibloc
>> wrote:
....
>>>Women are indeed human beings. So killing a woman is murder, and there
>>>is a difference between killing two human beings and killing one.
>>>
>>>If a man killing a pregnant woman is charged with killing a second
>>>human being,
>>
>>
>> IF IF IF IF.... You are quite adept at prefacing your lies with IFs
>> so that they are "not technically lies." Fact is, when a man kills a
>> pregnant woman he is only charged with one homicide.
>
>LaToyia Figueroa
>
>The man who was the father of LaToyia Figueroa's unborn child will face
>trial on two counts of first-degree murder

One charge of the murder of a human being, one charge of the muder of
a fetus. Look up the Penn. criminal code, idiot.

....
>In 1969, Teresa Keeler, eight months pregnant....
>The California Supreme Court dismissed the charges, saying that only
>someone born alive could be killed, and that the fetus was not a human
>being.
>
>Due to public pressure the murder statute was eventually amended to say
>that murder charges can only apply to fetuses older than seven weeks, or
>beyond the embryonic stage.

Right. Murder of a fetus, not the murder of a human being.

>Currently, 30 states recognize the unlawful killing of an unborn child
>as homicide in at least some circumstances

A fucking lie, as is usual from Pro-Lifers. It is fetal homicide,
covered separately from homicide. The laws you cite prove that the
fetus is not a living human being.