soc.women

On Aug 13, 10:39 am, elcoy...@ (Paul Anderson) wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 05:01:44 -0700,
>
>
>
>
>
> ...@ wrote:
> >On Aug 10, 1:24 pm, rfisc...@ (Ray Fischer) wrote:
> >> < ...@ > wrote:
> >> >You know I'm Pro Life,
>
> >> Anti-choice.
>
> >> > and the thing I have against pro-choicers isn't
> >> >the fact that they want to allow abortions. I can understand the pro
> >> >choice position even though I don't agree with it. What bothers me is
> >> >the fact that pro choice people want to impose their belief system on
> >> >me. .
>
> >> You're lying. Nobody wants to force you to get an abortion.
>
> >> >I don't mind people disagreeing with my views, but I do mind people
> >> >not allowing me to have my own views.
>
> >> Nobody is preventing you from having your views, pro-liar.
>
> >> --
> >> Ray Fischer
> >> rfisc...@
>
> >The irony of you calling me a liar is almost humorous: "Nobody is
> >preventing you from having your views, pro-liar."
>
> >Here's a hint for you Ray: generally, when you insult someone's views
> >that is not considered open minded acceptance of them.
>
> Allowing you to have your own view doesn't mean accepting it as
> correct or logical or just or moral. Allowing you to have your own
> view doesn't mean anyone else has to have the same warped view

I never said it did mean any of those things.

But you know what it does mean, Paul? It means not calling me a liar
when I state my view.

There's a difference between responding to someone and saying "You're
wrong" and responding to them and saying "You're lying".