soc.women

james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> In article < $ @edtnps82>,
> Ken Chaddock wrote:
>
>
>>james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>
>>>In article < $ @edtnps89>,
>>> Ken Chaddock wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> Which "lie" would that be ? Many pro-life supporters *BELIEVE* that a
>>>>>>fetus is simply one stage in the continuum of human life and as such, is
>>>>>>as inseparable from the child it will become as that child is from the
>>>>>>adult it will become.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Pro-liars believe many irrational things. You even believe that a
>>>>>fetus is a human being worthy of rights but a pregnant women is not a
>>>>>human being with rights.
>>>>
>>>> The only liar in this thread appears to be you Ray
>>>
>>>
>>>excuse me, are you the "ken Chaddock" who has been referred to as
>>>liar ken by spartacus and others?
>>
>> Well I would tend to wear that as a badge of distinction, considering
>>where it comes from. Spartacus and "some others" tend to call anyone a
>>"liar" who disagrees with them...particularly when that one shakes their
>>belief system by pointing out it's logical limitations and practical

> i recall those conversations and i can see how you earned that
> nickname, "liar ken."

Then your memory is faulty. As I recalled Spartacus claimed that I has
mis-attributed him however when I re-posted *ALL* of the thread from my
first message to the one two messages *after* spartacus made his false
claim there was no "mis-attribution" evident...
Now YOU might want to call Spartacus a liar for claiming that I had
done something that I clearly, on the evidence, did not do, I, however,
would be a little more circumspect and would tend to give him the
benefit of the doubt and "assume" that he made a simple error...but
that's just me...

...Ken