Ken Chaddock
>Ray Fischer wrote:
>
>> Ken Chaddock
>>
>>>Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ken Chaddock
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Ken Chaddock
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Gwenyth Bennet wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Aug 3, 7:27 am, Martin
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Gwen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On Aug 3, 6:29 am, Quadibloc
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 19:26:40 -0400, "james g. keegan jr."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>As written, the bill would ban women from
>>>>>>>>>>>>seeking an abortion without written consent from the father of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>fetus. In cases where the identity of the father is unknown, women
>>>>>>>>>>>>would be required to submit a list of possible fathers.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>This is disgusting, because the murder of an innocent child is no less
>>>>>>>>>>>murder simply because the woman has her partner as an accessory.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Lying about the issue isn't going to score you points with anybody but
>>>>>>>>>>the slimeballs.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>hang on a sec.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>You did read the paragraph below? I thought Quad put forward good
>>>>>>>>>arguments from both a pro and anti view as to why this proposal was a
>>>>>>>>>load of crap.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I addressed John Savard's lie.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which "lie" would that be ? Many pro-life supporters *BELIEVE* that a
>>>>>>>fetus is simply one stage in the continuum of human life and as such, is
>>>>>>>as inseparable from the child it will become as that child is from the
>>>>>>>adult it will become.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pro-liars believe many irrational things. You even believe that a
>>>>>>fetus is a human being worthy of rights but a pregnant women is not a
>>>>>>human being with rights.
>>>>>
>>>>> The only liar in this thread appears to be you Ray.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"I know you are but what am I?"
>>>>
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I realize that you, like many others, don't have the moral fortitude to
>>>>>accept that abortion (with current technology) means killing a fetus
>>>>>that is a developing human being
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>In the same way that using a condom kills a million developing human
>>>>beings.
>>>
>>> You see Ray, it's extremist, logically deficient and objectively (and
>>>obviously) incorrect statements like this that destroy your credibility.
>>
>> That you're too stupid to recognize that I used your argument against
>> you is something I see regularly from pro-liar morons.
>
> Oh I recognized you unsuccessful semantic ploy...I ignored it since it
>was of no consequence but to make it clearer, the fundamental difference
You ignored it because you were embrassed at your stupidity.
>>>Condom use no more destroys a fetus
>
>> I didn't write "fetus", moron.
>
> An imaginative, yet disingenuous use of semantics to attempt to create
Quit whining about your sleazy stupidity, pro-liar.
--
Ray Fischer
rfischer@