soc.women

hw...@ wrote:
> On Oct 7, 3:24 am, David Moss
> wrote:
> > In article ,
> >
> > tvaerska...@ writes...
> > > On Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:36:17 GMT, Svenne wrote:
> >
> > > >On Sat, 6 Oct 2007 15:10:48 +0100, "Paddy Johnson"
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > >>> Actually we went into the statistics in detail here in
> > > >>> earlier this year and found the number of rapes in the Norwegian capital
> > > >>> to be on the low side of the historical expectation. Try it on another
> > > >>> newsgroup Nazi.
> >
> > > >>Is the number of rapes 6x higher than NYC?
> >
> > > >>Are the immigrant groups grossly over-represented?
> >
> > > >>What is the number of rapes that occurred in a year and just what was the
> > > >>historical expectation for that year?
> >
> > > >Here's a Norweigian newspaper report in English:
> >
> > > Like, here:
> >
> > > /english/local/
> >
> > We dealt with that particular article in months ago too.
> > In the middle of the article it states:
> >
> > "Nine out of ten cases do not make it to prosecution, most of them
> > because police do not believe the evidence is sufficient to reach a
> > conviction."
> >
> > So we have an interesting situation where a claim is made about the
> > number of immigrants who commit rape, but that 9 out of 10 of the
> > allegations never proceed to prosecution because the police do not
> > believe their is sufficient evidence to prove the allegation.
> >
> > Neo-Nazis then try to spin this into a claim about a Mislim rape
> > epidemic.
>
> Or it could be that the Norwegian police are institutionally racist.

Oh no, it couldn't possibly be that! Not the fish eaters.