Group: soc.women
From: Svenne
Date: Monday, October 08, 2007 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: Women to blame for Muslim Rape Blitz On Norway Capital

On Mon, 08 Oct 2007 00:23:32 -0700, parris_k@ wrote:

>> Despite a politically correct tendency to try to ignore the ethnicity
>> of rapists, there is enough reporting in Swedish media for a clear
>> tendency to be seen. Muslim immigrants are grossly overrepresented in
>> rape statistics.

>Hmm... not strictly true. See below.

Like it shows below, the four top nationalities overrepresented in the
rape statistics are Algerian, Libyan, Moroccan and Tunisian.

>> Research by the Swedish authorities published in has shown that the
>> crime in which immigrants are most overrepresented is rape. The rate
>> for rape amongst immigrants is 9 out of every 10,000 compared to 2 out
>> of every 10,000 for ethnic Swedes. The nationalities mostly
>> overrepresented in Swedish rape statistics are Algerian, Libyan,
>> Moroccan and Tunisian:

>The next biggest group being Italians (?!)

>It must be that Mediterranean air...

I doubt it is the air breathed by Italians that puts their nationality
in fourth place in the rape statistics after those from Muslim
countries. But a reason there must be, unless it is argued that the
overrepresentation in rape statistics is purely random and next year
it could easily be Chinese, Tibetan Buddhists and Norweigans who top
the list.

That immigrants from Muslim countries regularly top rape statistics
suggests that there is some factor at work to cause this. I don't
think it is the air breathed, and it certainly isn't genes, since
there isn't any genetic difference worth speaking of between Homo
Sapiens.

This leaves memes and it is just there that is the first and obvious
place to look for an explanation. What is there in the belief system
and mind set of those who produce a significant overrepresentation in
rape statistics that could account for it. The common factor seems to
be Islam, a notoriously male chauvinist and misogynist superstition of
a religion.

>> /nyheter/0003/13/

>> I don't see how admitting this fact can be considered racist.

>No. What conclusions one draws from the facts, however...

Certainly.

But I don't see how suspecting that a lunatic misogynist superstition
might be creating a perverted mind set that spills over into action in
a small but disproportunate number of followers of that superstition
can be considered racist.

Svenne