rec.arts.movies.past-films

kfw1206@ wrote:
> On Sep 15, 11:29 am, Bernie Woodham wrote:
>> kfw1...@ wrote:
>>> On Sep 15, 10:52 am, Bernie Woodham wrote:
>>>> Maggie Gallagher is the owner of the website you mention.
>>> I didn't know that, but it doesn't matter. You can see for yourself
>>> that the site has both liberal and conservative voices.
>>>> I also notice you didn't "correct" my assumption about your "Natural
>>>> Law" source, so I figure you're inadvertently confirming that.
>>> I'll tell you my view of natural law once you admit that support for
>>> same-sex partnership isn't a rightwing Christian position. Until then,
>>> I don't debate madmen and liars, I just refute their lies.
>> I never said that support for same-sex partnership was a right-wing
>> position. I'm saying that you're a right-wing christian in denial.
>
> Comes to the same thing. Political conservatives don't hold my
> position, and I have always voted Democratic. Anyhow, you're only
> labeling as an excuse to dismiss.

I'm not labeling as an excuse to dismiss, I'm labeling to get at the truth.

> That would be like a right wing
> Christian saying, you're gay, and so therefore your opinions can be
> discounted. As noted, that's bigotry, and facts remain facts.
>

No, it's not like that at all. I'm not saying "You're a right wing
Christian, therefore you're opinions can be discounted." I'm saying,
"You are not be honest about who you are. So it's difficult to take your
words at face value."